Image and characters ™ and © DC Comics. |
The “TMK Legion” occupied the first 38 issues and three annuals of Legion of Super-Heroes volume 4 from 1989-92. The initials stand for the series' principal creators, writers Tom and Mary Bierbaum and writer/artist Keith Giffen.
Giffen, the principal of the principals, has been pilloried and praised by Legion fans ever since. His Legion pretty much defined the word “controversial.” Among the many changes Giffen wrought: the deaths of long-time favorite Legionnaires, the mutilation of another, the destruction of earth’s moon, and, finally, the destruction of earth.
Some developments worked better than others. Giffen straddled a fine line between storytelling with profound significance and shock value, a trait TMK shares with the legendary Watchmen, from which Giffen appears to have derived more than a little inspiration.
Giffen, the principal of the principals, has been pilloried and praised by Legion fans ever since. His Legion pretty much defined the word “controversial.” Among the many changes Giffen wrought: the deaths of long-time favorite Legionnaires, the mutilation of another, the destruction of earth’s moon, and, finally, the destruction of earth.
Some developments worked better than others. Giffen straddled a fine line between storytelling with profound significance and shock value, a trait TMK shares with the legendary Watchmen, from which Giffen appears to have derived more than a little inspiration.
In fact, Giffen seemed to go out of his way to alienate long-time
Legion fans, which invites certain question: How far can a writer go in
challenging and provoking readers?
Should you seek controversy in your own stories? And how do you manage the inevitable fallout?
We can probably learn a lot from one of the most
controversial revelations during the TMK run, a backup story which set many
fans on edge. Ironically, Giffen had
little if anything to do with this story. Only the Bierbaums are credited as writers, with Brandon Peterson as penciller
and Scott Hanna as inker.
Spoiler Warning: The following
discusses details of the unnamed backup story from Legion of Super-Heroes (volume 4) Annual # 3, 1992. Proceed at your own
risk.
Garth = Proty
One of the most hated developments of TMK was the revelation
that retired Legionnaire Garth Ranzz (Lightning Lad) was really Proty I, an
amorphous, shape-changing blob who once sacrificed his life for Garth.
Okay, the story’s a bit more complicated than that. It involves Proty’s life essence/soul/mind/whatever
metaphysical term you prefer being transferred into the otherwise dead body of
Lightning Lad back in Adventure Comics # 312 (September 1963). Proty lived as
Garth for the next twenty years, serving the Legion with distinction and
eventually marrying the love of Garth’s life, Saturn Girl, and fathering four
children with her.
The story hints that Saturn Girl may have known about the
switch all along and turned a blind eye.
Many fans object to this revelation because it seemed so
unnecessary. Garth was not a central
player in the TMK Legion—why reveal that he isn’t, in fact, Garth now? Others resent the implication that a beloved
hero wasn’t who they thought he was. Some can’t accept the notion of Garth and Imra (Saturn Girl) choosing to
live their lives based on a lie.
Those are all good objections, and raising such a discussion
was surely the Bierbaums’ intent. After
all, the same story portrays the now adult Legionnaires as flawed in other
ways. Two long-time members apparently
have an affair. A jealous son comes
dangerously close to perpetuating the sibling hatred which dominated some of
the Legionnaires’ lives. One Legionnaire
abandons his wife to run off on a mission.
So, why did Giffen and the Bierbaums do all this? Were they trying to destroy the characters
fans loved so much?
Hardly.
Why Proty/Garth may
have been a good idea
Some fans praise the Bierbaums’ story because, in the end,
the revelation made little difference except to explain away certain personality inconsistencies. The
hero they read about for maybe 95 percent of Lightning Lad’s career was a
considerate, somewhat idealistic hero, not the hot-headed, immature jerk of
Garth’s early appearances (and a personality to which the character has
returned in successive reboots).
My own take on the story falls along these lines. From a science fictional point of
view, the revelation is pure genius. It
casts our understanding of a long-time character in a new light (which,
incidentally, is what fiction ought to do: illuminate some aspect of the human
condition). It offers a literal
interpretation of the struggle we all face: coming to terms with our humanity.
Still, adverse reactions are understandable. Many fans (including me) grew up identifying
with certain characters or seeing them as fictional friends. To learn they are not who we thought they
were is disconcerting. Such a revelation
destroys our image of the character (and, I daresay, of ourselves). It thrusts us into new territory, and we
don’t know how to respond.
In the end, however, the revelation of Proty/Garth could be taken as one of the most
positive changes to come from TMK. No
one died or was mutilated. No planets
were destroyed. Garth may have been
living a lie, but he and his family were relatively happy. In a nice reversal, Garth (unlike the
previously mentioned Legionnaire) refuses to go on a mission so he can stay home and take
care of his family.
What does a hero look
like?
The story also challenges our images of heroes. I think it’s telling that Lightning Lad—one
of the most conventionally handsome Legionnaires, who had one of the most
dashing costumes and dynamic powers—turns out to possess the spirit of a faceless blob with a
far less dynamic power. And yet it was
Proty I, back in Adventure # 312, who sacrificed himself to save Saturn Girl.
Proty may not have been sexy, but he was every inch a hero.
And, in making that sacrifice, Proty winds up
spending the rest of his life with the woman he loves—making this a
rare TMK offering with a sense of optimism.
Controversy: should
you or shouldn’t you?
So, should you court controversy in your own writing?
As with everything else in writing, it depends.
If you want to create a story which people will talk about
and analyze for years or even decades to come, go ahead.
Just be sure to duck when the brickbats come.
2 comments:
Hello, I enjoy reading all of your article. I wanted to write a little comment to support you. gmail login
Thank you for your support, Siegfried.
Post a Comment